Just when you least expected it, a re-launch of sorts! (Don’t get too excited, though.)
Quite a few things going on in the Netherlands at the moment, but the main reason for this post is to compare one of the major events of the last week with a similar situation occurring right now in Australia.
Over here, Prime Minister Julia Gillard of the Australian Labor Party (ALP) is facing a challenge to her leadership by Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd, who was ALP Prime Minister from 2007-2010, before he was overthrown by Gillard, who went on to lead Labor to a very narrow victory in the 2010 elections, resulting in a minority government including Greens and Independents. Almost two years later, and with Labor sinking to record lows in the opinion polls, Rudd’s decided that he wants his old job back. So who will decide this? The hundred or so ALP MPs in the federal parliament. They’ll cast their votes at a caucus meeting on Monday.
The media has been buzzing with media speculation for the last few weeks, so even if there was no intention by Rudd to challenge, the endless commentary probably made it seem inevitable. In any case, it looks like Gillard will win comfortably, for reasons I’m not going to go in to here because by the time I’d finish you’d either be asleep or very confused, and there are far more interesting things to discuss.
The link between the ALP brawl here and the Netherlands is that the Labour (PvdA) parliamentary leader there resigned a couple of days ago, without much of the breathless media hype that we’ve seen in Australia. Job Cohen, once the very popular Mayor of Amsterdam, had been at the helm of the PvdA since a bit before the 2010 elections, where he effectively missed out on becoming Prime Minister by a single seat. Fast forward two years and the PvdA is predicted to lose half of its 30 seats in the Tweede Kamer should an election be held soon.
It began with a leaked e-mail to Cohen from a disgruntled PvdA MP, and after a few days of speculation, Cohen held a party meeting, where he realised he didn’t have the support of more than around half of the PvdA MPs, so he decided to step down and leave parliament. It all happened pretty quickly, actually, and with a lot more dignity than the situation in Australia. The party membership will now vote to determine the new leader from the sitting MPs – two of whom have already nominated.
For what it’s worth, I’ve always liked Cohen (I very much appreciated his speech on the evening of the 2010 elections when he spoke warmly of the gains made by D66 and GroenLinks despite the PvdA arguably having lost seats to them), but there are many reasons for his failure to break through with the electorate – his inability to work out exactly how to be the opposition leader, his fraught relations with the Socialist Party, and no doubt the vicious attacks by Geert Wilders didn’t help. Cohen admitted that he was unable to provide the PvdA with sufficient vision and inspiration. He is more a politician from the Paas-era: calmly seeking consensus and co-operation. This hasn’t gone down well in the highly-combative post-Fortuyn era.
Speaking of Geert Wilders: recently he claimed in parliament that the PvdA had been welcoming of immigrants from Muslims countries for all these years because they were “cattle for votes” (doesn’t translate well, I know). This claim is based around the fact that most Muslims vote for the PvdA, with GroenLinks also attracting a significant portions of the Muslim vote. Of course, might this be because these two parties are among the few who don’t demonise immigrants, Muslims in particular? The Socialist Party leader, Emile Roemer, was so outraged at Wilders’ comments that he walked angrily out of the Tweede Kamer, closely followed by the rest of the Socialist MPs.
UPDATE: I’ve just realised that Wilders made these comments several months ago. But he’s probably been repeating them endlessly since then, so perhaps in the context of this post, they should been seen as typical of the hatred he so eagerly spouts. The website where you can report a “Pole causing trouble” is a recent development, though.
Either way, Prime Minister Mark Rutte, who has been taking a hands-off approach to Wilders’ berserk outbursts (the PVV recently set up a website where people could report “Polish workers” who were “causing trouble”), admitted that the comment was inappropriate. Rutte will be hoping that the new PvdA leader will be keener to work with him than Cohen was so that he has to rely less on Wilders, who is becoming more poisonous by the day.
But the news that has been understandably dominating the headlines for the last week regards Prince Johan Friso, the second of Queen Beatrix’s three sons, who has been in an induced coma in Innsbruck hospital for several days after being caught in an avalanche while skiing at Lech, a famous ski resort in Austria. The 43-year old Prince was dragged along for a couple of hundred metres by the rush of snow, and stuck under half a metre of it for twenty minutes before he was dug out. The paramedics admitted that it took a long time to resuscitate him, and so far it is unclear what kind of lasting damage there will be, if any. His situation continues to be described as stable but serious.
Needless to say, in a country where the monarchy is greatly loved (90% approval rate last time I checked), there are a lot of people hoping for a successful recovery. Despite being a republican in principle, I certainly count myself among them.